material (which wrong application makes many turn their back on Paul’s argument; cf. New Testament commentator C.H. Dodd). Rather, Paul’s analogy stresses the right of God, like a potter, to make whatever He wishes of that which is His own, according to His own purposes. God does not have to answer to anyone else for doing so (cf. Job 33:13). Should God have created all men for no other purpose than to consign them to an eternity in hell (which, of course, He didn’t—not because man was so precious
Pages 49–50